
We help you map out a clear plan of action that balances long-term value creation and short-term goals through a facilitated process that engages key stakeholders to generate organizational buy-in and create total transparency.
KROMITE is unique in that it uses both financial valuation (e.g., for late stage projects) and non-financial valuation utilizing Multi-Objective Decision Analysis as part of its customized portfolio processes. As a result, KROMITE has created millions of dollars in value for its clients by helping them focus on assets that maximize value while managing risk. We bring together top-down portfolio strategy and bottom-up project assessment to develop robust processes that can meet short and long-term organizational deliverables. Every one of our portfolio management processes is customized to meet your needs and to align it with your organization's culture. Our goal is ensure that you have functional and sustainable processes and tools in place.
KROMITE is the leading practitioner of Multiple Objective Decision Analysis (MODA) in the healthcare and life science industry. We use MODA to help clients gain clarity around decisions and derive valuable insights for
decisions involving multiple conflicting objectives, and
situations where the value of the assets cannot be quantified using traditional financial approaches (e.g. Net Present Value {NPV}, Internal Rate of Return {IRR}), and when transparency is critical.
KROMITE has applied MODA to a wide range of problems, including prioritizing early stage pharmaceutical project portfolios where NPV is less credible but prioritizations must be made.
KROMITE uses MODA as a framework to explicitly capture the objectives of the organization and distill them to specific metrics, which are measured for each project (e.g., "Differentiation" can be one measure for the organizational objective of Innovation).
We use a systematic facilitation process and an analytical method supported by the Society of Decision Professionals as well as the Decision Analysis Society. Working with our clients, we develop definitions for each metric, establish the importance (or weight) for metrics and objectives, and develop value functions - all of which can be used to efficiently determine the value of each asset in the context of the overall objectives while taking into account risk and uncertainty.
New insight can be gained by using MODA for resource allocation, project prioritization, portfolio optimization, and portfolio balancing.
[Link to white paper "Deciding which project to fund"]
See "Deciding which Projects to Fund" for more details.
KROMITE uses discrete event simulation modeling to help you gain insight into throughput, constraints, costs, and resource needs within a complex system (e.g. R&D, Manufacturing, Distribution). We have built simulations for a number of pharmaceutical and agricultural companies and we specialize in customized simulation models that generate insightful output as well as real-time visualizations of the system under study. This type of modeling allows for what-if analyses at a cost that is orders of magnitudes less than building a sample pilot system.
In the healthcare and life science industry, simulations help with:
pipeline analyses that incorporate projects and resources from research to launch, and
impact assessment of key events such as mergers, spinoffs, and licensing.
These models identify capacity constraints and over-capacity likelihood in complex operations, such as R&D, in the presence of uncertainty. They also help with resource management, infrastructure what-if analyses, portfolio management, and long-term financial forecasts.
Benefit-risk assessment is a fundamental element of drug development with the aim to strengthen decision making for regulators, payors, providers, and patients. Customized benefit-risk assessment can provide useful information for proactive intervention in health care settings, which could save lives, reduce litigation, improve patient safety and health care outcomes, and lower overall health care costs. We have been focusing on post approval benefit-risk assessment methodologies.
We argue that a structured benefit-risk assessment is not simply a statistical exercise, but should be a multi-disciplinary effort involving experts in clinical science, patient advocacy groups, safety assessment, decision science, health economics, epidemiology and statistics. Multiple stakeholders, each with their own objectives and perspectives, are involved in making treatment decisions. Instead of ignoring the different perspectives and insisting upon one set of benefits and risks and one way to measure their impact, we believe we need to embrace the difference and help all stakeholders make consistent, well-thought out decisions.
KROMITE has been helping companies assess and then mitigate or manage project (indication or single use), compound, and portfolio risk for over nine years. Once the type of risk (financial, technical, other) and the level of risk (project, compound, etc.) have been identified, KROMITE will work with the teams and/or experts to quantify the likelihood of events occurring. The impacts of those identified risks will also be determined either in a financial sense or non-financial sense (a compound financial may have both a financial impact as well as an impact on a current partnership or the reputation of the company). Technical risks have become a very important element of the risk-adjusted value of a project or compound. KROMITE has access to valuable benchmarks and often uses these to check the subjective assessments of involved experts.